Keeping the Love Alive

Yesterday at noon I asked Dorothy what she wanted for lunch. She said she wasn't hungry. She just wanted tea. So I asked her what kind of cheese she would like. That's right. She said 'tea' and I heard 'cheese'. That sort of misunderstanding goes on all the time at our house. So whatever I think I hear, I'm a bit skeptical. 

The truth goes astray in many places: sensation, perception, understanding, intention, finding the words, telling the story, hearing the story, decoding meaning, making sense of it, making a plan, doing what is required. It is a miracle when you want tea and actually get tea.

It's Good Friday today and Easter is coming. Some of us will spend an hour this Sunday reminding ourselves that Jesus arose after death. Do we imagine that crucifiction and resurrection pay the price for our sin? Do we disrespect, exclude, libel, abuse those who do not share our belief? In the absence of humble skepticism, we may glorify the Easter story and ignore the Truth to which it points. 

Perhaps it isn't about
reassembling Jesus' molecules
to prove that
OUR GOD is bigger than their god. 

Maybe resurrection is
keeping the Love alive.

Happy Easter from our house.

Canada Votes

We got our voting cards today. Guess who we support in the coming federal election. This is the Liberal party sign that we asked to be displayed on our front lawn.


When I took this picture, the wind was from the northwest and the Liberals were leaning right. That's a joke. Get it? Campaigning has been in the west the past few days. Lots of rightwing thinking on the prairies, and lots of promises from all the parties aimed at winning their support.

OK. It wasn't that funny. But it is something to think about. They know what they are doing. They are buying votes. Why are they not ashamed, all of them, every party? And why do we tolerate it? Well, we tend to tolerate dirty tricks if it's our party playing them, because tricks are justified if they work. Why are we not ashamed? There should be one promise, to serve all the people leaving nobody behind.

Now look here.


When I took the picture from another point of view, the Liberals are leaning left. Nothing else has changed. I conclude that the way we do politics is much too simple. The terms right and left don't tell us who to vote for. Even the party names are misleading. You don't know what you are getting until you examine the policies. No, you don't know what you are getting until they are actually in office making decisions. No, you don't know what you are getting until you see the consequences. No, those consequences persist, so the great-grandchildren might have a better idea whether we got it wrong. I was going to say right rather than wrong, but that would be confusing.

The problem with democracy in its current iteration is the party system, a contest which rewards those who best appeal to the lowest levels of human motivation: simplicity, indifference, fear, anger, avarice, selfishness, thoughtlessness, tribal unity. They figure out what we want and make promises, sometimes different promises as they move about the country. Of course, when they form government, they discover that every issue involves weighing multiple competing imperatives, costs, benefits, values, loyalties. You can't please everybody all the time, but what you get is criticism from everybody all the time because there is always something to complain about and complaints are more fun than praise. What sort of idiot would enter politics just to be the target of everyone's dissatisfaction?

What we need in government is people who want to make things better for everyone, with a variety of perspectives, who can think as well as emote about an issue, who aren't taking orders from the party whip, whose status is not tied to an ideology or the reward of their group winning an argument. We need to flatten the hierarchy, less power at the top, so that all elected members have a say and decisions are made on the basis of what is revealed by the discussion rather than who wins. If the decisions are good, everybody wins.

I'm dreaming, of course. We won't do away with the party system in my lifetime. That won't stop me from imagining government based more on reason and conscience and less on ambition and slogans.

****************

Cluster Thinking is Damaging Our Politics: Jonny Thomson, Big Think, March 2025

Campaign Highlights: CBC News, April 2025

Climate Change Policy: Aaron Wherry, CBC News, April 9, 2025

B.C. Drug Consumption Sites: Ashkay Kulkarni and Katie DeRosa: CBC News, April 9, 2025

About That

One more note in this trilogy: This, That and The Other. That directs our attention to the environment. However, the notion of the environment as something separate from the self is a paradigm with implications I must challenge once again. 

A video produced by the IPCC in 2023 ends with the slogan "Our climate. Our future" demonstrating a sense of responsibility (good) barely emerging from a sense of ownership, management, use and control (maybe not so good). Whose climate was it before we showed up? Who will be responsible for it when we are gone, and then whose future will it be?

We need to see the world first as a whole within which humanity is one species among millions, a problematic late arrival rushing to the sixth mass extinction with a presumption of entitlement. Meanwhile microplastics accumulate in our brains, another unintended consequence of our ingenuity. 

We have a choice. We could aspire instead to belong with respect and restraint to a regenerating world where happy children play for seven generations and more.

I've said all of this before. You can read it again in earlier notes.

****************

Some environmental thoughts from past blogs:

Belonging to the Earth: Nov 2021

While Heaven Thaws: Jan 2022

Make a Plan: March 2022

Cousins of Wolves: Aug 2022

Spring Again: March 2023

Seeds: March 2023

Paving Paradise: March 2024

I Wonder

Here is the promised sequel to This, That and The Other. I was going to write about this (the self), but noticed after the first sentence that I was already fully engaged in the other (what I make of it). So what follows is entirely what I make of the self. If you are looking for an exposition on the actual self, you are on your own.

I know. It's hard. You don't want to do it on your own. Neither do I. So I read some books by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Robert Sapolsky, etc. But when I did that, I got what they made of it rather than the actual self. I keep yes-butting, reminding myself "never sell your soul for a theory". 

I continue wondering. I look closer for the self within systems of organs, tissues, cells, organelles, molecules, atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, up-quarks, down-quarks, antiquarks, the Higgs boson (remember the God particle), wavicles, and such: that train of thought still leaves me wondering. I don't see myself in there.

We bring God into this because theologies are older than the Higgs boson and demonstrate the point very well. If we knew God we might know ourselves better. But don't tell God what to be because God is what God is in spite of what we think. Maybe God is not the omnipotent champion of our tribe who will ensure victory over the unbelievers, who, by the way, are in possession of something we want. If we don't sell our souls for that theory, good for us. Maybe God sees us as friends who are tragically stuck in a false idea of who we are. 

I wonder.
That's what I make of myself. 
I am a wonderer.

This, That and The Other

One of my readers will recognize the title of this note because it was her idea, another phrase like 'here and there' or 'now and then', redirecting our attention in saccades to simplify and get a complete picture bit by bit. OK, let's go with this, that and the other.

Reality can be deconstructed in a variety of ways. For this note and perhaps a few to follow, I choose these categories: the self (this), the environment (that), and what we make of it all (the other). 

To begin, notice that paying attention to one thing means ignoring all the rest, at least for the moment. Take for example apostle John's assertion that the origin and totality of things is the WORD, ignoring that a word is a symbol in which we store meaning and that meaning derives from experience and that experience requires sentience that emerges from the singularity only after billions of years of random events in an arbitrary universe. John was ignorant of semiotics, mathematics, physics, cosmology, chemistry, biology, evolution and all the other conceptual schemes I left out. His world (not his reality, but rather what he made of it) began a few days before Adam, who, according to legend, appeared in an instant, awake and full of words. Not very likely, but we can believe anything if we try.

I stopped trying about grade 11 when I learned that before the word arrived, almost everything was already here. The word is an emergent phenomenon generated by an organism that came late in the story and may be gone in an instant. 

Let's be humble about words. When we are done with deconstruction, we have to put the pieces together as best we can to have a coherent idea of reality. This and that is far more than the other we describe with our humble words, our 'isms and 'ologies.

But we can have some fun trying.

*****************
Some interesting this and that.

Global Fossil Fuel Emissions Increase in 2024: Global Carbon Project, Nov 2024

Canada's Climate Plan is Working: Gov Canada National Inventory Report, March 2025

Now and Then

Out for a walk yesterday, we encountered a pair of robins doing what comes naturally at this time of year. They were not interested in us, except to keep clear because people are scary. I suspect that there was not much thinking going on with the birds. A robin's little brain is good for migration, mating, evading people; but all of that is inherited instinct. Daniel Dennett (no longer with us) would call it Darwinian behaviour, reflex built into the neural network through evolution with little experience or imagination or reason involved. 

I don't mean to disrespect the robins. Their tiny brains serve them well. But they learn very little, and they have no foresight or imagination or reasoning. Robins don't obsess  about a nest full of eggs hatching into hungry little birdies needing to be fed, and then decide to stay single because the family thing is too much bother. It's all about now. Then will look after itself. They see a potential mate and go into their dance. They see us coming on the sidewalk, and fly off to dance elsewhere. They find a likely place to build a nest following a blueprint written in their genes. I recall years ago, when a robin claimed our front porch for nesting and spent hours attacking his reflection in the window because he was programmed to defend his territory against rival males. To give him credit, that usually works; but in this case, not so clever.

Dennett postulated several other potential modes of mental activity given a sufficiently well-developed brain. Skinnerian behaviour involves trying something out at random, and if it works, do the same thing next time. Popperian thinking imagines likely outcomes of possible actions, and then tries what is most promising. Gregorian thought makes use of tools (language, books, videos) for gathering and transmitting knowledge and evaluating it critically. 

The birds may get as far as learning from first-claw experience. Good for them. But it takes a human brain to access the past and make a rational plan for the future based on accumulated wisdom, i.e. first-hand experience plus all the rest: myth, legend, history, all the books in the library and bytes on the Internet. Furthermore it takes a lazy self-absorbed human brain to think like a bird when accumulated wisdom is available. So in my opinion, if a human is so obsessed with the task at hand (getting elected by ignoring the real cost of energy) that the future doesn't come into it (preventing climate disaster), that birdbrain should get out of the way when actual humans are deciding what to do. 

Apologies to the birds. 

Apologies to grandchildren who are already suffering the consequences of a century of human ignorance. 

Apologies in advance to great grandchildren who may decide that having a family isn't worth the bother in a world that is unravelling...

...unless we value then enough to pay what we owe now.

**************

The Insanity of Carbon Capture Deception: Just Have a Think, March 16, 2025

CO2 Pipeline Leak in Mississippi: CBC News, March 16,  2025

Carbon Pricing 101: David Suzuki and Ian Hannington, April 2024

Axe-the-Tax Poillievre: CBC News, Jan 2025

Climate Action is Less of a Priority. Trump Isn't Helping: Kyle Bakx, CBC News, March 15, 2025

Predictions of Future Global Climate: UCAR

University Corporation for Atmospheric Research: take a look before it gets Trumped

Stuff I'm Reading

I just finished 'The Certainty Illusion' by Timothy Caulfield, and now I'm not sure of anything. 

My next book is one I have already read and mostly forgotten. It is "Value(s): building a better world for all" by Mark Carney. As I recall, it isn't an easy read, although its key ideas are worth the trouble, even more relevant than in 2021 when it was published. Just knowing Mark Carney better is worth the trouble given his emerging importance in Canadian federal politics. 

A synopsis of "Value(s)" is available free at SoBrief.

If you want to know what Mark Carney thinks, you could spend some time with his book as I intend to do once again. If you want to know what I think, read the rest of this note. It won't take so long. Tiny mind.

We have the tools we need to keep the planet from unravelling. Let me do what Moses did and list some 'commandments' or rather Existential Principles that will make things go better.

0. Take care of yourself. If you don't do this, you don't get to do anything else. (I will call the dentist on Monday.)

1. It is what it is. Life is beautiful but hard. (I put this in because I have another toothache. Brush and floss or not. Expect consequences.)

2. Take care of others. We don't survive or thrive by taking care of ourselves alone. (How about universal dental care?)

3. Truth awaits forever in the questions. (Why am I having more pain after the root canal? I thought the nerve was gone.)

4. Think bigger. It's not all about us. (Do elephants get big toothache?)

5. Think longer including future generations. (OK kids. No candy for you. You're going to live long and prosper, if you keep your teeth.)

6. Risk action based on what you know, and learn from consequences. (I took acetaminophen and naproxen. Stopped aching for awhile.)

7. Extremes are dangerous. Find the sweet spot between opposing imperatives. ('Sweet' may be the wrong word given the tooth pain.)

8. Be good. What is good for us may be bad for them. It goes better for everyone when they belong among us. Grow the circle. (Our friends at the candy store are going to go broke. I should keep eating chocolate.)

9. Learn from the past, but don't get stuck there. Things could be better. Make them better. (I think I will get it pulled rather than paying for another root canal.)

10. There's more. Up to you. Add to the list. 

****************

Stuff Dave's Been Reading: Just Have a Think, March 2, 2025

A Viral Political Meme: Big Think