Beyond Systems Thinking: Deconstructionology, Jim Palmer
What Fungal Networks Can Teach Us: Science Matters, David Suzuki and Ian Hannington
I don't know what I think until I see what I write
Beyond Systems Thinking: Deconstructionology, Jim Palmer
What Fungal Networks Can Teach Us: Science Matters, David Suzuki and Ian Hannington
Yes, but
32°C is more than enough
even for daisies.
We just took a walk around the block, pausing whenever we found shade under a tree. The daisies are stuck in the sun. Must give them a drink.
Lucky us, compared to those enduring an Omega Heat Wave in Europe last week with temperatures reaching above 40°C.
It's our fault, we Homo kaputiens. We have evolved with a will to thrive that erodes the conditions supporting life even for daisies. We have known this was happening for decades but we did it anyway because our collective will expressed in business and government prioritizes here and now. Elsewhere and later is somebody else's problem... until elsewhere is here and later has arrived, and we are dealing with the accumulated deferred cost of past human excesses. Our preferred solution, according to most business and some governments, is much more of the same. Never mind the daisies.
If instinct wins over intelligence, we are kaput. Let's pretend to be intelligent.
I know. We aren't very good at it.
Daisies may do better when we are gone.
**************
Heat Dome. How to Stay Safe: CBC News, June 30, 2026
America's Climate Warning System: Just Have a Think, June 28, 2026
Alberta's Pipeline Proposal: CBC News, June 30, 2026
Energy Innovation in Alberta: CBC News, June 25, 2026
Canada's Energy Future: Prime Minister Mark Carnie, June 30, 2026
"Nobody's Perfect", The making of 'Some Like It Hot': Youtube. (Just for fun)
During the cold months past, I have been lurking for free on Substack.com, exploring information and opinions about anything and everything (science, climate, economics, philosophy, politics, religion...), and leaving clever comments to set things straight, yes-butting ignorance toward enlightenment.
Yesterday I read The Church Paul Described Terrifies Modern Pastors with a quote from First Corinthians 14: “When you come together, each one has a hymn, a teaching, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation.”
Interesting. Church with no pastor, everyone bringing what they can for the benefit of the group.
Yes, I see the genius of that, worshipers as participants rather than audience. Reminds me of God as Holy Spirit rather than law giver and judge. But how would this distributed divinity work in a large congregation?
OK, anybody who has something inspiring to tell us, line up at the microphone. And speak up when it's your turn.
Someone has to give the orders, and the rest of us have to follow their lead. And somebody has to shut down the nutter who interrupts the other speakers with a "yes-but" argument.
Pastor: Just listen. You can talk when it's your turn.
Yes, like God silenced Paul until he changed his mind about Jesus. But that stroke was probably brought on by his rages about the Jesus cult. Stupid to get so worked up about other people's beliefs.
To explore that thought further, I searched Substack for 'stupid' and found Bonhoeffer's Theory of Stupidity, We Have More To Fear From Stupid People Than From Evil Ones.
Interesting. I thought about yes-butting that one with a clever comment like:
yes stupid is dangerous, but stupid plus evil would be worse and clever plus evil would be as bad as it gets.
I was going to illustrate that thesis with examples and body count statistics, but something stopped me from publishing. Funny thing about yes-butting, nobody likes a wise guy. Sometimes a wise guy should keep quiet and yes-but himself.
Yes, Substack has been rekindling the teacher in me, but not your favourite teacher.
Yes, I thought I had retired from teaching, but it feels like I'm still in school, sometimes teaching and sometimes being taught.
Yes, I know, it's stupid to waste time in a yes-but rut, arguing with faceless phantoms on Substack. But I needed something to do when the snow was on the ground. Sorry if I sounded critical.
Enough of that. I deleted my Substack account. I'm going to go dig the garden.
****************
Physical activity helped a bit. For the past hour, I yes-butted along the fence while the shovel did it's thing. Yes, I scattered a mix of flower seed into the dirt. And (not but) maybe something nice will come of that.
Socrates had it right when he said the wise man knows he is a fool. So today there are two of me here setting each other straight on a lovely spring day while we finish this note.
Now that we have confessed our stupidity, what do we say to a nap? Yes?
zzzz ZZZZZZZ
zzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz
****************
Awake once more, I searched "wise fool". Yes, the sense of the quotation is what I intended, but I need to correct a misattribution. The wise-fool saying is from "As You Like It", Act V, scene 1, words spoken by Touchstone: "The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool." As for Socrates', his thought on the matter is rendered as "I know only one thing, that I know nothing."
As for me, now I know that I got the quote wrong.
Somewhere between caterpillar and butterfly there is a pupa (caterfly?) undergoing remarkable transformation.
"Within the chrysalis, the caterpillar’s tissues undergo histolysis, a process of controlled self-digestion. Most of the larval cells break down into a nutrient-rich soup, while the imaginal discs and certain other groups of cells survive. These surviving cells then use the available nutrients to construct entirely new tissues and organs. The caterpillar’s body is reorganized into that of an adult butterfly—complete with wings, compound eyes, proboscis, and reproductive organs." (Science News Today)
That must have happened to produce the white butterfly we saw yesterday, first of the season, identical to all those white butterflies we saw last year.
What happens in a chrysalis is a striking analogy for this chapter of the planetary story. We find the biosphere, including human affairs, collapsing in many ways: biodiversity, climate, global and national politics, energy supply, the economy, food security, religion, relationships, health, fertility. What if this is the chrysalis from which Earth may emerge as something beautifully new with or without people? What if the human obsession with consumption and growth has been our larval stage, and as emerging adults we have other concerns, an evolving worldview.
A metaphor gets us thinking, but is never exact. Once it has our attention, we learn much from how it doesn't fit. For a particular species, what emerges from the chrysalis is almost always the same. If it fails to repeat the inherited plan, the butterfly probably doesn't survive. Very occasionally, a mutation turns out to be useful, and will be passed on to progeny.
In the human realm, we have history to lead us into the future, but it is a future unlike anything in history. If we faithfully replicate what the ancestors have done (including war, exploitation, extraction, extermination, pollution), we race to the sixth mass extinction. Fortunately we are equipped with a tool that the butterflies lack. We have imagination.
We either reinvent what it is to be human, or the world will evolve without us.
***************
New Climate Research Warns of Faster Warming: Just Have A Think
A Question Of Margin: Bill McKibben
An Attractor Nobody Sees: How civilizational dissolution reorganizes itself: Richard David Hames
